Even as racial justice advocates simultaneously mourned the deaths of Alton Sterling, Philando Castile, and the five police officers killed Thursday night in Dallas, they were forced to defend the nature and aims of their movement while fearing that the violence they seek to quell will only get worse.

That the shootings took place toward the tail end of a peaceful Black Lives Matter protest immediately muddied the narrative, leading some pundits and politicians to pin blame for the attack on the national movement against police violence as opposed to the individual gunman, who told police before he died that he had operated alone and was unaffiliated with any groups.

Critics pointed out that in addition to explicitly drawing connections between the shooter and Black Lives Matter, the media and others were implicitly vilifying the movement and deepening existing divides. And as journalist Lauren Chanel Allen wrote on Twitter and at her blog, the attacks had the effect of shifting the conversation “quickly and perfectly” so that “[w]e were no longer talking about the heinous murders of Alton Sterling and Philando Castile.”

The Black Lives Matter (BLM) network released a statement Friday morning condemning the shootings in Dallas, calling the violence “a tragedy–both for those who have been impacted by yesterday’s attack and for our democracy.”

(Responding to BLM’s words, EBONY Magazine‘s senior editor Jamilah Lemieux noted: “This sort of humanity is not often seen when a police officer has needlessly taken the life of a civilian; in fact, police message boards have found chilling expressions to the contrary over and over again.”)

Click Here: cheap INTERNATIONAL jersey

The BLM statement continued:

Indeed, as the ACLU of Texas said in its response to the shootings, “If the night had gone as the protesters and police planned, this would have been a demonstration of what makes our country great: a citizenry publicly proclaiming their objection to government wrongs, and public officials protecting the citizenry’s constitutional right to air their anger and disapproval. Tragically, this quintessential example of democracy was ripped apart, and the nation awoke today to learn of more shootings and more deaths.”

But organizers, activists, and supporters of the movement refuse to allow Thursday’s attack on law enforcement tamp down or distract from serious and necessary debates over police brutality, racism, and gun violence.

Lilly Workneh, Black Voices senior editor at the Huffington Post, said:

Kai Wright, features editor for The Nation, added:

Meanwhile, during an emotional press conference on Friday morning, members of the Congressional Black Caucus (CBC) were also asked to clarify their support for the BLM movement in the wake of the Dallas shooting. They did so passionately.

“People cannot use Black Lives Matter as a scapegoat. Those young kids came together to protest,” said Rep. Cedric Richmond (D-La.).

“If someone goes in a building and assassinates five police officers, they are a terrorist, they are not part of Black Lives Matter,” declared CBC chairman George Butterfield (D-N.C.).  

“America should know those protests were non-violent. They were crying out in pain,” said Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee (D-Texas).

The CBC instead directed its ire at House Speaker Paul Ryan and his Republican colleagues, whom Butterfield charged with “refusing to address gun violence in America.”

Indeed, Rep. Al Green (D-Texas) declared: “The speaker of the House has to be called on the carpet for what he’s failed to do.”

The CBC vowed to continue pushing for commonsense gun reform legislation before Congress leaves on its summer break—a call echoed by the Coalition to Stop Violence, whose executive director Josh Horwitz said Friday:

Reaction to the Dallas attack continues to percolate on social media:

#DallasPoliceShooting Tweets